Prompt Engineering for Coding
The difference between mediocre and exceptional AI assistance
Good prompts are the key to getting great results from AI coding tools. This section provides battle-tested templates and best practices.
π Quick Start Templatesβ
π Debuggingβ
I'm getting this error: [ERROR MESSAGE]
In this file: [FILE PATH]
Here's the relevant code:
[CODE BLOCK]
Context: [WHAT YOU WERE TRYING TO DO]
Help me understand what's wrong and how to fix it.
π Refactoringβ
Refactor this code to be more [maintainable/performant/readable]:
[CODE BLOCK]
Requirements:
- Keep the same functionality
- Follow [LANGUAGE/FRAMEWORK] best practices
- Add comments explaining changes
π Documentationβ
Write comprehensive documentation for this code:
[CODE BLOCK]
Include:
- Function/class purpose
- Parameter descriptions
- Return value explanation
- Usage examples
- Edge cases
π§ͺ Testingβ
Write unit tests for this function using [TESTING FRAMEWORK]:
[CODE BLOCK]
Cover:
- Happy path
- Edge cases
- Error handling
- Boundary conditions
π― Prompt Engineering Principlesβ
1. Be Specificβ
Bad: "Fix this code" Good: "Refactor this React component to use hooks instead of class components, maintaining the same functionality"
2. Provide Contextβ
Bad: "Add error handling" Good: "Add try-catch error handling with user-friendly messages for API calls in this Next.js page"
3. Show Examplesβ
Bad: "Write a function" Good: "Write a function like this example: [EXAMPLE], but for my use case: [YOUR CASE]"
4. Iterateβ
Start broad, then refine:
- "Create a login form"
- "Add validation for email and password"
- "Add loading states and error messages"
- "Make it responsive and accessible"
π Template Categoriesβ
By Task Typeβ
-
Debugging Templates (12 templates)
- Error analysis, stack trace reading, performance issues
-
Refactoring Templates (15 templates)
- Code cleanup, pattern implementation, modernization
-
Documentation Templates (8 templates)
- API docs, README files, inline comments
-
Testing Templates (10 templates)
- Unit tests, integration tests, test data generation
-
Code Review Templates (5 templates)
- Security review, performance review, best practices check
π Best Practicesβ
β Do'sβ
- Provide full context and relevant code
- Specify the technology stack
- Ask for explanations, not just code
- Request multiple approaches when uncertain
- Save and reuse successful prompts
β Don'tsβ
- Copy-paste without understanding
- Skip error messages or logs
- Use vague language ("better", "faster")
- Forget to specify constraints
- Ignore warnings about best practices
π₯ Advanced Techniquesβ
Chain of Thought Promptingβ
Let's solve this step by step:
1. First, analyze the requirements
2. Then, design the architecture
3. Next, implement the core logic
4. Finally, add error handling and tests
[YOUR PROBLEM]
Role-Based Promptingβ
Act as a senior [ROLE] with expertise in [TECHNOLOGY].
Review this code and provide:
- Security concerns
- Performance issues
- Best practice violations
[CODE]
Constraint-Driven Promptingβ
Write a [COMPONENT] with these constraints:
- Must support [BROWSER/VERSION]
- No external dependencies
- Maximum 100 lines
- Follow [STYLE GUIDE]
[REQUIREMENTS]
π‘ Real Examplesβ
Example 1: React Component Refactoringβ
Before (vague):
Make this better
After (specific):
Refactor this React class component to:
1. Use functional components with hooks
2. Extract custom hooks for data fetching
3. Add TypeScript types
4. Follow React 19 best practices
5. Improve accessibility
Result: Much better AI output with clear requirements
Example 2: Bug Investigationβ
Before (incomplete):
This doesn't work
After (complete):
I'm getting "Cannot read property 'map' of undefined" in this React component:
[COMPONENT CODE]
Steps to reproduce:
1. Navigate to /dashboard
2. Click "Load Data"
3. Error appears
Expected: Data should display in a list
Actual: Error appears and app crashes
Environment: React 19, Next.js 15, Node 20
Result: Precise diagnosis and solution
π οΈ Tools Integrationβ
For Cursorβ
Save frequently used prompts as .cursorrules files in your project root.
For Claude Codeβ
Create a prompts/ directory with markdown files for each template.
For ChatGPT/Claudeβ
Use the "Custom Instructions" feature to set default behavior.
π System Prompts Deep Divesβ
Want to understand how professional AI coding tools work under the hood? Explore our deep-dive analyses of system prompts from popular tools:
Cursor System Prompts Analysisβ
Deep dive into Cursor's core design philosophy and 5 key patterns:
- Context-First Strategy
- Tool Transparency Principle
- Proactive Execution Mechanism
- Semantic Search First
- Simplified Code Editing Format
Best for: Developers who want to understand how AI coding assistants work and apply these patterns to their own workflows
Claude Code System Prompts Analysisβ
Deep dive into Claude Code CLI tool's extreme minimalism design philosophy and 6 key patterns:
- Extreme Minimalism Communication Strategy
- Edit-First, Create-Never Philosophy
- Professional Objectivity Principle
- Context-Aware Tool Delegation
- Parallel Execution Priority
- Git Safety Protocol
Best for: Developers who want to understand CLI-optimized AI tool design and learn minimalist efficient interaction patterns
Cline System Prompts Analysisβ
Deep dive into Cline open-source AI coding assistant's user approval-first design and 6 key patterns:
- Mandatory Iterative Execution with Approval
- One Tool Per Message Principle
- Dual-Mode Architecture (PLAN/ACT)
- Progressive Context Gathering
- Approval Stratification Mechanism
- Search/Replace Block System
Best for: Developers who want to understand open-source AI tool design and learn safe approval workflows
π Learn Moreβ
- Code Snippets - Ready-to-use code
- Best Practices Guide - Advanced tips
- System Prompts Repository - Source of our analyses
π€ Contribute Your Promptsβ
Found a prompt that works great? Share it with the community β