Cheap Patches, Expensive Reviews: What Debian's LLM Resolution Is Actually Asking
I opened the HN thread expecting a tidy summary. The submission title said "LLM Usage in Debian: Three Proposals." When I clicked through to the official Debian General Resolution page, it listed four.
That gap — three on the aggregator, four on the source — is a small thing, but it caught my attention in the way small things do when a governance process is still moving. The page showed a status of In Discussion and a discussion-period date of 2026-07-24. Nobody has voted. Nothing is decided. The community is working through something genuinely hard, and the working copy keeps changing under everyone's feet.